The European Commission justifies the imposition of additional duties on Chinese EV imports based on the results of their anti-subsidy investigation. The investigation concluded that the battery electric vehicles (BEV) value chain in China benefits from unfair subsidization, which poses a threat of economic injury to EU BEV producers. This determination allows the European Commission to impose countervailing duties on imports of BEVs from China to offset the subsidies and level the playing field for EU producers(3). The duty rates vary for different Chinese EV makers, with BYD facing a 17.4% duty, Geely facing a 20% duty, and SAIC facing a 38.1% duty. These duties are in addition to the ordinary BEV import duty of 10%.
How does the European Commission justify the imposition of these additional duties on Chinese EV imports following their anti-subsidy investigation?
Sources:
TSMC April Revenue Soars 48% as U.S. Tariffs Trigger Rush Orders
China's Foreign Trade Volume of Tea Grows in 2024
Nvidia to Release Modified H20 Chip for China in Response to U.S. Export Restrictions
China Confident in Handling U.S. Trade Issues Ahead of Key Talks
China's Exports Surge 8.1% in April as U.S. Tariffs Take Effect
China's New-Energy Passenger Car Sales Surge in April
Swiss Drugmaker to Build New Manufacturing Facility in Shanghai
Chinese Listed Companies Report Combined Revenue of over 71 Trillion Yuan in 2024
SMIC to Monitor Tariff Impact on Demand as Q2 Outlook Remains Uncertain, Says Co-CEO
Bain Capital Plans Sale of China Data Center Unit in Deal Potentially Exceeding $4 Billion