NextFin news, On October 17, 2025, the capital city of Bangladesh, Dhaka, witnessed violent clashes between police forces and protesters outside the national Parliament complex. The unrest coincided with the signing of the July National Charter, a political roadmap proposed by the interim government headed by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus. The charter, developed after consultations with over 30 political parties but notably excluding the former ruling Awami League, outlines constitutional amendments, legal reforms, and anti-corruption measures aimed at restructuring Bangladesh’s political landscape following the mass uprising in July 2024 that led to the ousting of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
Police employed tear gas, stun grenades, and batons to disperse several hundred demonstrators who identified themselves as activists from the 2024 uprising. The protesters expressed dissatisfaction that the charter failed to address their demands for welfare guarantees and recognition of sacrifices made during the protests, which reportedly resulted in up to 1,400 deaths according to United Nations estimates. The clashes resulted in injuries and property damage, including vandalism of police vehicles and makeshift tents.
The July National Charter was signed by major political factions including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) led by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, eight allied parties, and several Islamist groups such as Jamaat-e-Islami, which had initially hesitated. However, some left-wing and newly formed student-led parties, including the National Citizen Party, refused to participate. The charter proposes significant reforms such as enhancing presidential powers to balance the historically dominant prime ministership, instituting term limits for legislators, and implementing measures to curb corruption and conflicts of interest. The interim government has pledged to hold national elections in February 2026, though the absence of Hasina’s Awami League raises questions about the inclusiveness and legitimacy of the forthcoming polls.
The political turmoil in Bangladesh is rooted in the deep polarization and authoritarian tendencies that characterized Hasina’s 15-year tenure, which culminated in the mass uprising of 2024. The interim government’s attempt to institutionalize reforms through the July National Charter represents a critical effort to reset the country’s governance framework. However, the exclusion of the Awami League, currently banned and with Hasina in exile facing trial in absentia on charges of crimes against humanity, complicates the political reconciliation process.
From a governance perspective, the charter’s emphasis on checks and balances and anti-corruption aligns with global best practices aimed at preventing the concentration of power and fostering transparency. The proposed empowerment of the presidency to counterbalance the prime ministership could recalibrate Bangladesh’s semi-presidential system, potentially reducing executive overreach. However, the nonbinding nature of the charter and its dependence on parliamentary approval post-elections introduce uncertainty regarding its implementation.
Economically, political instability and violent protests risk undermining investor confidence in Bangladesh, a country that has experienced robust growth driven by its garment export sector and remittances. The unrest could disrupt economic activities in Dhaka, the commercial hub, and deter foreign direct investment at a time when Bangladesh seeks to transition to middle-income status. Moreover, the political exclusion of a major party may prolong instability, affecting policy continuity and economic reforms.
Socially, the protests highlight unresolved grievances among segments of the population who feel marginalized in the political transition. The failure to incorporate their demands into the charter risks perpetuating cycles of unrest and undermining social cohesion. The government’s use of force to quell demonstrations may exacerbate tensions and attract international scrutiny regarding human rights practices.
Looking ahead, the success of Bangladesh’s political transition hinges on the inclusiveness of the upcoming elections and the genuine implementation of the charter’s reforms. The interim government faces the challenge of balancing reformist ambitions with the need to engage excluded political actors to ensure stability. International actors, including the United Nations and regional powers, will likely monitor developments closely, given Bangladesh’s strategic importance in South Asia.
In conclusion, the protests erupting in Dhaka as major political parties sign the July National Charter underscore the fragile and contested nature of Bangladesh’s political transformation. While the charter offers a blueprint for reform, its partial acceptance and the ongoing unrest reveal deep structural challenges. The trajectory of Bangladesh’s democracy and governance will depend on how effectively the interim government manages political inclusivity, addresses social grievances, and implements institutional reforms ahead of the February 2026 elections.
According to ABC News, the clashes and political developments on October 17, 2025, mark a pivotal moment in Bangladesh’s post-uprising era, with significant implications for regional stability and democratic governance.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
