NextFin news, On October 15, 2025, Salesforce, the global cloud-computing leader, was sued by authors Molly Tanzer and Jennifer Gilmore in a U.S. federal court. The plaintiffs accuse Salesforce of copyright infringement, claiming the company unlawfully used thousands of copyrighted books, including their own works, to train its artificial intelligence software, specifically the xGen language model. The lawsuit was filed in California and represents a class action on behalf of numerous authors whose works were allegedly exploited without permission or compensation.
The authors are represented by attorney Joseph Saveri, known for litigating similar cases against major technology firms. Saveri emphasized the need for transparency and fair remuneration for content creators whose intellectual property fuels AI development. The complaint underscores that Salesforce’s CEO Marc Benioff has publicly criticized other AI companies for using "stolen" data and advocated for compensating content owners, yet Salesforce itself allegedly engaged in similar practices.
This lawsuit emerges amid a wave of legal actions targeting tech giants such as OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms, all accused of training AI models on copyrighted material without authorization. The plaintiffs argue that the unauthorized use of literary works violates copyright laws and undermines the economic rights of authors. Salesforce has not yet issued a public response to the allegations.
The case raises fundamental questions about the sourcing of training data in AI development. AI models like xGen rely on vast datasets scraped from the internet, including books, articles, and other copyrighted content, to learn language patterns and generate human-like text. However, the lack of clear licensing agreements or compensation mechanisms for original content creators has sparked legal and ethical controversies.
From an industry perspective, this lawsuit could set a precedent affecting how AI companies acquire and use training data. The economic stakes are significant: the global generative AI market is projected to exceed $100 billion by 2030, with training data costs and intellectual property rights becoming critical factors. If courts rule in favor of authors, AI firms may face increased licensing fees, stricter data usage policies, and potential redesigns of their training pipelines.
Moreover, the case highlights a growing regulatory and societal push for accountability and fairness in AI. Under the current U.S. administration led by President Donald Trump, there has been increased scrutiny on technology companies regarding data privacy, intellectual property, and ethical AI deployment. This lawsuit aligns with broader efforts to establish clearer legal frameworks governing AI training data and protect creators’ rights.
Looking ahead, the Salesforce lawsuit may accelerate industry-wide adoption of transparent data sourcing practices, including negotiated licenses and royalty payments to authors and publishers. It could also prompt legislative reforms to clarify copyright applicability to AI training. For authors and content owners, this represents an opportunity to assert control and monetize their works in the AI era.
In conclusion, the legal challenge against Salesforce underscores the complex intersection of AI innovation, copyright law, and creator rights. As AI technologies continue to evolve rapidly, balancing technological advancement with intellectual property protections will be crucial to fostering sustainable growth and trust in the AI ecosystem.
According to NewsBytes, this case is part of a broader trend of lawsuits challenging the AI industry's data practices, signaling a pivotal moment for how AI companies engage with copyrighted content moving forward.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
